Reactions
-
Re: Modified fonts — exclusive or non-exclusive?
Ah yes. In this case, the exclusive part of the request came after a basic, non-exclusive Desktop license was quoted and approved. And so we've had to backtrack some to clarify what they're really n…1 -
Re: Need critique on experimental-ish letterforms for my personal brand.
Nice... though the C kind of seems a bit too open/loose compared to other three letters being more compact and more tightly woven together. I wonder if the terminals of the C get extended a bit so th…5 -
Re: Critique needed for sans serif wordmark
When you feel it's in a good place, can you post another before/after image with one on top of the other for comparison again... I mean the original version to newest version.1 -
Re: Critique needed for sans serif wordmark
I hear you Philipp. I think I see the B as a little too dark and narrow compared to the O and N (agree about not wanting the D flimsy), so the balance feels a little off to me. As for the staggered E…1 -
Re: New logo
I like the general idea of trying to have uniformity of shape and angle with the J and S, but at a quick glance I'd be concerned that the S reads like a cursive/script L ("Lantos").2
